jump to navigation

The Incredible Hulk June 26, 2008

Posted by Sai in English, Movies, Reviews.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
trackback

Another superhero film to whet our appetite before we can get to see what we really want to watch this summer, The Dark Knight. The Incredible Hulk isn’t anywhere as entertaining as the biggest blockbuster of the summer so far (Iron Man). But it is a watchable superhero film.

Louis Leterrier (The Transporter) directs this film written by Zak Penn. The screenplay gets a nice balance between angst and action and Leterrier handles the film well enough but it lacks the special something to make it worthy of a sequel. The film starts off nicely with Dr. Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) in a foreign land, searching for a cure and hiding from his enemies. As you’d expect, he can’t hide for long as the audience is waiting to see the Hulk. So, he is found, the Hulk appears and the film is on. On his heels are General Thaddeus (William Hurt) and Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth).

The film is different from other origin stories because it only hints at the origins in flashbacks without explaining too much (much like the Bourne films). The main premise is that Hulk is looking for something to cure him of his condition and there are others who are on his tail to capture him for their own diabolical needs. Of course, there is also the customary love interest (Liv Tyler) and this role isn’t particularly interesting. One wishes there was more humor because the tempo starts to drop a bit in the midsection. The climactic battle has a couple of nice moments but doesn’t exhilarate enough.

After Robert Downey Jr., we’ve got another respected actor turning superhero. The role is right up Edward Norton’s alley but I enjoyed Tim Roth’s turn as Abomination better. Norton also contributed to the screenplay but was refused credit by the WGA.

Leterrier has said that there is 70 minutes of additional footage waiting for the DVD release meaning that the studio got its way. It could result in a somewhat better film on DVD in the future. Or maybe not. Either way, I’m not terribly interested to check it out.

If you enjoy superhero movies, this is not a bad watch and apparently it is much better than Ang Lee’s 2003 flop that prompted this early reboot. If you are not the kind who wants to watch every superhero film out there, wait for The Dark Knight or even Will Smith’s Hancock.

P.S. Don’t get too excited by Tony Stark’s appearance on the trailers. It is just a plug for the Avengers movie and he doesn’t appear on screen for more than a few seconds.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Shujath - July 2, 2008

The green monster isn’t exactly my idea of a superhero. In fact, when I had seen Ang Lee’s film a few years back, I didn’t have a clue that Hulk was a “Marvel” superhero….and I think that’s why I liked that one as it never tried to be a superhero flick.

For the same reasons, “Incredible Hulk’ worked for me only as long as Ed Norton was on the run. The climactic monster fight didn’t impress me either (actually neither did the ones in Transformers and Iron Man – in all such fights I find it hard to figure who’s hitting who).

The only other thing I found appealing here is the casting of Tim Roth as Hulk’s nemesis. He is wonderful.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: